Skip to content
Dissecting The Man Who Knew Coolidge: A Literary Analysis by Sinclair Lewis

Dissecting The Man Who Knew Coolidge: A Literary Analysis by Sinclair Lewis

“Dissecting The Man Who Knew Coolidge: A Literary Analysis by Sinclair Lewis” is a compelling article that explores the work of American novelist and playwright Sinclair Lewis. In this piece, the author delves into Lewis’ book “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” and examines the themes and motifs that are present throughout the novel. Through a careful analysis of Lewis’ writing style and character development, the article provides a unique insight into the mind of one of America’s most celebrated literary figures.

The Man Who Knew Coolidge: A Literary Analysis by Sinclair Lewis

In his novel, The Man Who Knew Coolidge, Sinclair Lewis explores the life of a small-town businessman named George F. Babbitt. Set in the 1920s, the novel is a scathing critique of American society and its obsession with materialism and conformity. Through Babbitt’s experiences, Lewis exposes the emptiness and shallowness of the American Dream, and the ways in which it can lead to a life devoid of meaning and purpose.

One of the key themes of the novel is the tension between individuality and conformity. Babbitt is a man who has always followed the rules and done what is expected of him, but as he approaches middle age, he begins to feel a sense of dissatisfaction with his life. He longs for something more, something that will give his life meaning and purpose. However, he is trapped by the expectations of his community and the pressure to conform to societal norms.

Another important theme of the novel is the corrupting influence of power and money. Babbitt is a successful businessman who has achieved a great deal of wealth and status, but he is also deeply unhappy. He is consumed by his desire for more money and more power, and he is willing to compromise his values and principles in order to achieve his goals.

Overall, The Man Who Knew Coolidge is a powerful critique of American society and its values. Through Babbitt’s story, Sinclair Lewis exposes the emptiness and shallowness of the American Dream, and the ways in which it can lead to a life devoid of meaning and purpose. It is a novel that is as relevant today as it was when it was first published nearly a century ago.

Sinclair Lewis’s Background and Writing Style

Sinclair Lewis was born in 1885 in Sauk Centre, Minnesota. He was the youngest of three sons and grew up in a strict household. His father was a country doctor and his mother was a devoutly religious woman. Lewis attended Yale University but dropped out after his sophomore year. He then worked as a journalist and editor for various newspapers and magazines before turning to fiction writing.

Lewis’s writing style is characterized by his use of satire and his ability to capture the essence of American life in the early 20th century. He was known for his sharp wit and his ability to expose the flaws and hypocrisies of American society. His writing often focused on the struggles of the middle class and the tension between traditional values and modernity.

In The Man Who Knew Coolidge, Lewis uses his signature style to explore the life of a small-town businessman who becomes embroiled in political corruption. The novel is a scathing critique of American politics and the corrupting influence of power. Lewis’s writing is both humorous and poignant, and his characters are complex and fully realized.

Overall, Sinclair Lewis’s background and writing style are integral to understanding his work. His upbringing in a strict household and his experiences as a journalist and editor shaped his perspective on American society. His use of satire and his ability to capture the essence of American life make him one of the most important writers of the 20th century.

Plot Summary of The Man Who Knew Coolidge

The Man Who Knew Coolidge is a short story written by Sinclair Lewis. The story revolves around a man named George F. Babbitt, who is a successful real estate agent in Zenith, a fictional city in the United States. Babbitt is a typical middle-class American who is obsessed with material possessions and social status. He is a member of various clubs and organizations and is always trying to impress his peers.

Judique is a mysterious figure who seems to have a lot of knowledge about politics and the inner workings of the government. Babbitt is fascinated by Judique and starts spending a lot of time with him.

As the story progresses, Babbitt becomes more and more disillusioned with his life. He realizes that he has been living a shallow and meaningless existence and that his obsession with material possessions has left him feeling empty inside. He starts to question his values and beliefs and begins to see the world in a different light.

In the end, Babbitt decides to leave Zenith and start a new life. He realizes that he cannot continue living the way he has been and that he needs to make a change. The story ends with Babbitt walking away from his old life and towards a new, uncertain future.

Overall, The Man Who Knew Coolidge is a powerful commentary on the American Dream and the pursuit of happiness. It shows how easily people can become trapped in a cycle of materialism and how difficult it can be to break free from it. The story is a reminder that true happiness comes from within and that we should never lose sight of what is truly important in life.

Character Analysis of Main Protagonist

The main protagonist of Sinclair Lewis’ “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” is a man named Neil Kingsblood. Throughout the novel, Kingsblood is portrayed as a complex character with a strong sense of justice and a desire to do what is right. He is a successful businessman and a respected member of his community, but he is also a man who is deeply troubled by the racial injustices that he sees around him.

Kingsblood’s character is defined by his struggle to reconcile his own beliefs with the expectations of those around him. He is a white man living in a predominantly white community, but he is also the grandson of a black woman. As he becomes more aware of the racial inequalities that exist in his town, he begins to question his own identity and his place in society.

Despite the challenges that he faces, Kingsblood remains committed to his principles. He is willing to risk his reputation and his livelihood in order to fight for what he believes is right. He is a man of great courage and conviction, and his determination to make a difference is what ultimately drives the plot of the novel.

Overall, Neil Kingsblood is a fascinating and complex character who embodies the struggle for social justice in America. His story is a powerful reminder of the importance of standing up for what is right, even in the face of overwhelming opposition.

Character Analysis of Supporting Characters

One of the most intriguing aspects of Sinclair Lewis’ “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” is the cast of supporting characters that populate the novel. From the ambitious journalist, Max Gottlieb, to the enigmatic socialite, Joyce Lanyon, each character brings a unique perspective to the story.

Perhaps the most fascinating supporting character is Gottlieb, whose relentless pursuit of scientific knowledge often puts him at odds with the other characters. Despite his abrasive personality, Gottlieb is a sympathetic figure, driven by a deep passion for his work. His dedication to science is both admirable and tragic, as it ultimately leads to his downfall.

Another notable supporting character is Joyce Lanyon, a wealthy socialite who becomes embroiled in the novel’s central mystery. Lanyon is a complex character, at once charming and manipulative. Her motivations are often unclear, and her true intentions are only revealed in the novel’s climactic final act.

Overall, the supporting characters in “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” are a diverse and fascinating group. Through their interactions with the protagonist, Martin Arrowsmith, they shed light on the novel’s themes of ambition, morality, and the pursuit of knowledge.

Historical Context of the Novel

The Man Who Knew Coolidge, written by Sinclair Lewis, was published in 1928. This was a time of great change in America, as the country was transitioning from the Roaring Twenties to the Great Depression. The novel is set in the fictional town of Zenith, which is based on Lewis’s hometown of Sauk Centre, Minnesota. Zenith is a symbol of the American middle class, and the novel explores the lives of its citizens during this tumultuous time. Coolidge was known for his conservative policies, and the novel critiques the values of the middle class that supported him. Overall, The Man Who Knew Coolidge provides a fascinating glimpse into the historical context of the 1920s and the impact of political and economic changes on American society.

Themes Explored in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

The Man Who Knew Coolidge, a short story by Sinclair Lewis, explores several themes that are relevant even today. One of the most prominent themes is the idea of conformity and the pressure to fit in with societal norms. The protagonist, George F. Babbitt, is a successful businessman who is constantly trying to keep up with the expectations of his peers and society. He is afraid of being seen as different or unconventional, and this fear drives him to conform to the norms of his community.

Another theme that is explored in the story is the idea of disillusionment. Babbitt is initially portrayed as a content and satisfied member of his community, but as the story progresses, he begins to feel disillusioned with his life. He realizes that his success and wealth have not brought him true happiness, and he begins to question the values and beliefs that he has always held. This theme of disillusionment is particularly relevant in today’s society, where many people are questioning the traditional values and beliefs that have been passed down to them.

Finally, The Man Who Knew Coolidge also explores the theme of the American Dream. Babbitt is a symbol of the American Dream, as he has worked hard to achieve success and wealth. However, the story suggests that the American Dream may not be all that it is cracked up to be. Babbitt’s disillusionment with his life suggests that there may be more to life than just material success and wealth. This theme is particularly relevant in today’s society, where many people are questioning the traditional definition of the American Dream and what it means to be successful.

Symbolism in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

In Sinclair Lewis’s short story “The Man Who Knew Coolidge,” symbolism plays a significant role in conveying the themes and messages of the narrative. One of the most prominent symbols in the story is the character of Calvin Coolidge himself. Through his portrayal of Coolidge, Lewis critiques the narrow-mindedness and complacency of the American people during this time period.

Another symbol in the story is the character of George F. Babbitt, who is a recurring figure in Lewis’s works. Babbitt represents the conformist and materialistic tendencies of American society, and his presence in “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” serves to highlight the conformity and lack of individuality that characterized the era.

The setting of the story, which takes place in a small town in New England, is also symbolic. The town represents the insularity and provincialism of American society, as well as the resistance to change and progress that was prevalent during the 1920s.

Overall, the use of symbolism in “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” allows Sinclair Lewis to comment on the social and political climate of America during the 1920s, and to critique the values and attitudes that he saw as problematic.

Use of Satire in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

Sinclair Lewis, in his short story “The Man Who Knew Coolidge,” uses satire to criticize the American political system and the people who participate in it. The story follows the protagonist, a small-town newspaper editor named George F. Babbitt, as he attends a political convention and interacts with various politicians and delegates. Throughout the story, Lewis employs a sarcastic and mocking tone to highlight the absurdity and corruption of the political process.

One example of Lewis’s use of satire is his portrayal of the convention itself. He describes it as a “circus” and a “freak show,” with delegates wearing outlandish costumes and engaging in ridiculous antics. This depiction serves to emphasize the superficiality and spectacle of politics, as well as the lack of substance and seriousness in the issues being discussed.

Lewis also uses satire to critique the politicians themselves. He portrays them as shallow and self-serving, more concerned with their own personal gain than with the welfare of their constituents. For example, when Babbitt meets a senator at the convention, the senator immediately begins trying to bribe him with promises of favors and political appointments. This scene highlights the corrupt nature of politics and the way in which politicians use their power to enrich themselves at the expense of others.

Overall, Lewis’s use of satire in “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” is a powerful tool for critiquing the American political system and the people who participate in it. By highlighting the absurdity and corruption of politics, he encourages readers to question the status quo and demand better from their leaders.

Comparison to Other Works by Sinclair Lewis

In comparison to other works by Sinclair Lewis, The Man Who Knew Coolidge stands out as a departure from his usual satirical style. While Lewis is known for his biting critiques of American society and politics, this novella takes a more introspective and melancholic tone. The protagonist, Neil Kingsblood, is not a caricature of a flawed individual, but a sympathetic and relatable character struggling with his own identity and the prejudices of his community. Additionally, the novella’s focus on race relations is a departure from Lewis’s usual focus on white, middle-class America. Overall, The Man Who Knew Coolidge showcases Lewis’s versatility as a writer and his ability to tackle complex themes with nuance and sensitivity.

Reception and Criticism of The Man Who Knew Coolidge

The Man Who Knew Coolidge, a novel by Sinclair Lewis, was met with mixed reception upon its release in 1928. While some praised the book for its satirical take on American politics and society, others criticized it for its lack of a clear plot and character development.

Critics who enjoyed the book appreciated Lewis’s ability to capture the essence of the 1920s, a time of great change and prosperity in America. They also admired his use of humor and irony to expose the flaws in the political system and the people who ran it.

However, others felt that the book lacked a clear direction and failed to fully develop its characters. They also criticized Lewis for his use of stereotypes and caricatures, which they felt detracted from the overall message of the book.

Despite these criticisms, The Man Who Knew Coolidge remains an important work of American literature, offering a unique perspective on the political and social climate of the 1920s. Its satirical tone and commentary on the flaws of the American political system continue to resonate with readers today.

Influence of The Man Who Knew Coolidge on American Literature

Sinclair Lewis’s The Man Who Knew Coolidge has had a significant impact on American literature. The novel, which was published in 1928, explores the life of a small-town businessman who becomes involved in politics and rises to become a powerful figure in Washington, D.C. The book’s themes of corruption, greed, and the dangers of political power have resonated with readers for decades.

The Man Who Knew Coolidge has been cited as an influence on many American writers, including John Steinbeck, who praised Lewis’s ability to capture the essence of American life. The novel’s portrayal of the American Dream as a corrupt and destructive force has also been echoed in the works of authors such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway.

Lewis’s use of satire and irony in The Man Who Knew Coolidge has also had a lasting impact on American literature. The novel’s depiction of politicians as self-serving and dishonest has become a common trope in political satire, from the works of Mark Twain to the television show Veep.

Overall, The Man Who Knew Coolidge has had a profound influence on American literature, shaping the way writers approach themes of politics, corruption, and the American Dream. Its legacy continues to be felt today, as writers continue to grapple with the same issues that Lewis explored nearly a century ago.

Analysis of Lewis’s Political Views in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

In The Man Who Knew Coolidge, Sinclair Lewis presents a scathing critique of American politics and the corruption that pervades it. Through the character of Sam Dodsworth, Lewis explores the disillusionment and frustration felt by many Americans during the 1920s, a time of great social and economic change. Dodsworth, a successful businessman, becomes embroiled in the world of politics when his wife Fran convinces him to run for office. However, Dodsworth quickly discovers that the political game is not what he thought it was, and he becomes disillusioned with the whole system.

Lewis’s political views are evident throughout the novel, as he portrays politicians as corrupt and self-serving. Dodsworth’s opponent in the election, Senator Frost, is depicted as a manipulative and dishonest politician who will stop at nothing to win. Similarly, Dodsworth’s experiences in Washington D.C. reveal a world of backroom deals and shady characters, where the interests of the people are often ignored in favor of personal gain.

At the same time, Lewis also critiques the American public for their apathy and lack of engagement in the political process. Dodsworth’s campaign is met with indifference by many voters, who are more interested in their own lives than in the future of their country. This apathy, Lewis suggests, is a major factor in the perpetuation of corruption in American politics.

Overall, The Man Who Knew Coolidge is a powerful indictment of American politics and society in the 1920s. Through his portrayal of Sam Dodsworth and the world of politics, Sinclair Lewis offers a searing critique of the corruption and apathy that he saw as endemic in American society.

Use of Irony in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

One of the most notable literary devices used in Sinclair Lewis’ “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” is irony. Throughout the story, Lewis employs irony to highlight the absurdity and hypocrisy of American politics and society during the 1920s. For example, the protagonist, Neil Kingsblood, is a white man who discovers that he has African American ancestry. This revelation leads him to become an advocate for racial equality, but he is met with resistance and hostility from his white neighbors and colleagues. The irony here is that Kingsblood, who has always identified as white, is now fighting for the rights of a group of people who are discriminated against based on their skin color. This highlights the absurdity of racial discrimination and the hypocrisy of those who claim to be advocates of equality but fail to act on their beliefs. Overall, the use of irony in “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” adds depth and complexity to the story, and forces readers to confront the uncomfortable truths about American society and politics.

Analysis of the Ending of The Man Who Knew Coolidge

The ending of Sinclair Lewis’ “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” is a poignant and thought-provoking conclusion to the story of a man who has spent his life in pursuit of power and influence. As the protagonist, Shad Ledue, lies dying in his bed, he reflects on the choices he has made and the consequences of his actions. He realizes that despite his wealth and status, he has not achieved true happiness or fulfillment in his life.

The final scene of the novel is particularly striking, as Shad’s wife and daughter are shown mourning his passing while a group of businessmen discuss the potential profits to be made from his death. This contrast highlights the emptiness of Shad’s pursuit of power and the callousness of those who were once his associates.

Overall, the ending of “The Man Who Knew Coolidge” serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of ambition and the importance of finding meaning and purpose in life beyond material success. It is a powerful conclusion to a novel that explores the complexities of human nature and the corrupting influence of power.

Use of Imagery in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

In Sinclair Lewis’ The Man Who Knew Coolidge, imagery plays a crucial role in conveying the themes and emotions of the story. From the opening scene of the “gray, flat, and uninteresting” town of Zenith to the vivid descriptions of the characters’ appearances and surroundings, Lewis uses imagery to create a vivid and immersive world for the reader. One particularly striking example is the description of the protagonist, George F. Babbitt, as a “plump, smooth, and complacent” man, which not only paints a picture of his physical appearance but also hints at his stagnant and unfulfilled life. Through the use of imagery, Lewis is able to bring the story to life and engage the reader on a deeper level.

Techniques Used to Create the Setting in The Man Who Knew Coolidge

Sinclair Lewis, in his novel The Man Who Knew Coolidge, uses various techniques to create the setting of the story. One of the most prominent techniques is the use of vivid descriptions. Lewis paints a picture of the small town of Zenith, where the story takes place, with his detailed descriptions of the buildings, streets, and people. He also uses sensory details to create a sense of atmosphere, such as the smell of the factories and the sound of the trains passing through the town. Another technique Lewis employs is the use of historical references. The novel is set in the 1920s, and Lewis incorporates references to the political and social climate of the time, such as the rise of consumerism and the Prohibition era. These references help to ground the story in a specific time and place, adding to the realism of the setting. Overall, Lewis’s use of descriptive language and historical context work together to create a vivid and believable setting for The Man Who Knew Coolidge.

Analysis of the Title of The Man Who Knew Coolidge

However, the title is not simply a reference to Coolidge himself, but rather to the man who knew him. This suggests that the story is not about Coolidge, but rather about the man who had a personal connection to him. The use of the word “knew” also implies a level of familiarity and intimacy, which further emphasizes the importance of this individual in the story. Overall, the title sets the stage for a character-driven narrative that explores the relationship between this man and Coolidge, and the impact that it has on their lives.